Soundtrack Pro 2: Surround Matrix
Last week I came across a forum post that expressed envy. A long time pro-audio producer who worked exclusively on the PC platform stated that after taking one look at what Apple has done with Soundtrack Pro 2, serious decisions were in the works. My guess is that we may have another switcher on our hands.
I’m sure this person was able to maintain a high level of productivity on his PC’s. Conversely, I have to agree with him. This new STP UI is stunning to say the least. I realize that functionality, performance, and stability are essential when striving for consistent productivity. Personally, I think visual aesthetics play an important role as well. I can’t imagine spending hours buried in an ugly piece of software … I need to be impressed with the application environment as I work.
These issues of application UI aesthetics and attributes continue to puzzle me when considering the Pro Tools phenomenon. There is no question that Pro Tools is the industry standard, and I don’t need anyone to remind me of this. The problem that I have with Pro Tools is that is just looks so dated. But let’s be frank – it does what it is designed to do very well. I don’t see any reason to believe that widespread use will diminish anytime soon. Back to Soundtrack Pro 2 …
This UI is an example of how things have changed in this latest version of STP 2. I dragged a six channel 5.1 file from the browser into the multi-track project pane.
The producer is presented with a few options:
• Incorporate the entire six channel mix as a single file into a single track
• Incorporate individual files that represent individual channels extracted form the original. [this is done by holding the option key while dragging].
There are a few important things to note: the Surround Matrix HUD is associated with the selected track. If you choose not to use the HUD, the mini surround pan controllers located on each channel take over. The cool Timecode HUD is fully customizable [size and location]. Lastly, the Level Meters at the upper right adapt to project channel configurations.
One last point – notice the single channel strip at the lower left. The displayed strip is once again dictated by the selected track. Lets say for example I decided to switch out of the mixer display tab in the lower work-space in order to check metadata. The single channel strip allows me to maintain control of each channel level, sub-mixes, buses, and the master output while the mixer is hidden.
[the image is linked to a higher res. graphic]
Hi ptfigg,
You seem to be quite a step ahead in STP2, so let me ask you a question:
Do you have problems sending sequences from FCP6 to STP2.
I always lose my crossfades in the process although I check the option in FCP to preserve them. It does the same thing when I export an OMF and reimport it in STP2.
The levels and pans are preserved though.
Thanks in advance.
Eric.
Hi Eric,
Are you sending to STP2 as an “Audio File Project”, or a “Multitrack Project?”
Cross fades carry over with Multitrack Project exports.
As far as OMF support, I haven’t tested this. However the manual states:
“If you have cross fades in your edit, they are exported as linear cross fades regardless of the type used in the edit.” “Your audio editor should be able to reset …”
I’ll check this out later on today.
What do you think of the new apps so far?
-ptfigg.
I am so impressed with this release of Soundtrack Pro and plan to upgrade to Studio 2 very soon. I was wondering if you know what may be the most inexpensive way to get surround monitoring. At present, I am looking at the new Blackmagic-Design HD LINK Pro, but, I wondered if you have a different take on that question.
Thanks
Hi Keith,
I’m a fan of the HD Link Pro. Keep in mind that besides the 6 channel audio output, you are picking up robust support for video I/O as well. It’s a great deal. A standard audio interface would not be as flexible.
For a standard interface, I would suggest the Motu UltraLite. I believe it supports 8 channel output, and runs about $550 US.
Keep me posted on what you think about STP 2 once it’s up and running.
-ptfigg.
I am looking for multi-track non-destructive editing software for the Mac to use for editing podcasts and audio documentaries.
Apple’s web site sells SoundTrack and SoundTrack Pro very effectively. They certainly look beautiful. And I was ready to believe what the advertising says. But when I look at the Apple forums, there are people having problems with these apps being very slow.
Some years ago I used Protools. Yes it was ugly, but it was speedy even on a Mac G3. I’m wondering if Protools is the safest option due to its sheer age and maturity?
Difficult to know what’s what without trying them out isn’t it.
Hi,
I would say Pro Tools would be a good choice. Keep in mind that you will be forced to buy a piece of hardware.
Have a look at Digital Performer by Motu, also Logic Express.
In terms of Soundtrack Pro, I have experienced a few issues, however nothing major – and surely not consistent with what is referenced on the Apple discussion boards. I guess it all depends on how the application is used. Personally, I don’t work with a large amount of tracks. 5 or 6 at the most. Large scale multitrack projects seem to be one of the issues that is causing stability problems.
My guess is that a patch from Apple is in the works. I suspect many of the early bugs will be addressed and fixed.
Point is – if you are not in a hurry, wait it out and see what happens …
-ptfigg.
Thanks for those comments Paul.
I’m looking up Logic Express and Digital Performer.
Seems Logic Express kind of covers some of the same area as Soundtrack/Soundtrack Pro? And both from Apple. Confusing.
Ouch! Digital Performer is very expensive — $1600 in Australia — that’s more than the entire FCP package! Seems to be more aimed at musicians than straight audio editing.
Logic Express is $499 in Australia. That’s about 10% more than the full Final Cut Express package (which includes Soundtrack).
Seems like these are the least expensive options for a non-destructive (region based) editor.
BTW your blog posts are useful. As is your podcast. Your name pops up on a lot of the Conversations Network podcasts — I guess you’re kept busy doing those.
Thanks Paul,
I think the main difference between the Logic applications and STP is the interactivity with the rest of the Final Cut Studio applications, and the Logic apps. heavy support for music and score production.
Honestly, for podcast production – STP is probably what I would recommend. The problem is that you will be forced to purchase the entire bundle.
Many people are wishing that Apple changes this. My guess is that it will not happen. If they did, can you imagine the confusion that will be created with four audio applications avaialable as stand-alone apps.?
-paul [too]