Shure 55SH Series II Dynamic Mic …
The Shure 55SH Series II is a popular mic. In what manner? It’s used quite often by producers within this community as a visual reference on business cards, blog headers, and promotional media. Based on forum chatter, community feedback, and general inquires, my guess is that not many podcasters actually use this mic. I find this interesting because the 55SH II, commonly referred to as the “Elvis Mic”, is perfect for podcasting.
First, this dynamic mic has has a cardioid pickup pattern. This will help alleviate picking up sound that emanates from the rear. The frequency response – [50 to 15,000 Hz], is tailored for speech, it has an incorporated mount with internal shock protection, and it provides wonderful build quality. What I find particularly amazing is the price point. This is a professional quality mic that is readily available for less than $160 US. Great deal in my opinion.
Some thoughts … It would be difficult to state an accurate number, but I do think that it is safe to say that most radio stations continue to use the Electrovoice RE-20 microphone. There are obvious reasons for this timeless support: sound quality, build quality, and the fact that no special mic techniques are required in order to achieve optimum results.
Mic selection in Podcasting has become complex. I believe that podcasters spend more time contemplating mic choices than professional radio broadcast institutions do. My point is that radio stations do not try to “match” mics with air talent based on vocal characteristics.
Many of the podcasting community’s gear experts state that choosing a mic is a personal issue based on various factors. Besides sound characteristics and vocal matching, cost is an obvious consideration – not everyone is in the position to spend $400+ on a mic. Also, connectivity requirements [USB vs. traditional] play an important role as well.
I predict that new media producers will continue to embrace the “what mic works well with my voice” mentality. I believe that this approach will continue to create unnecessary confusion and contemplation. Can you imagine the confusion that would be created if the thousands of radio stations located around the world adhered to this concept?
I think that we need to pay close attention to the specific models that are designed for broadcasting within a predetermined budget, and we should forget the personal modeling approach.
I agree completely. Besides, if we’re going instead for a mic that picks up sound accurately, then all of the “sound” of the voice (or whatever is being miced) is then handled in post production.
So really what it comes down to is a LOT more versatility. What’s easier (and cheaper), trying to find a new mic for a different situation or another vocalist, or just turning a few knobs?
Keep up the good opinions, they are welcomed in a world of white-wash.