<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audio-Technica AT804 Broadcast Interview Mic &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://podcastacademy.com/2007/03/07/audio-technica-at804-broadcast-interview-mic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://podcastacademy.com/2007/03/07/audio-technica-at804-broadcast-interview-mic/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://podcastacademy.com/2007/03/07/audio-technica-at804-broadcast-interview-mic/#comment-14618</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 05:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcastacademy.com/2007/03/07/audio-technica-at804-broadcast-interview-mic/#comment-14618</guid>
		<description>On Transom.org folks have suggested this mic might be ideal to use with the Marantz 660 because its high impedance (600ohms) and sensitivity at 3.5 are an excellent match for the (lousy!!) mic preamps of that recorder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Transom.org folks have suggested this mic might be ideal to use with the Marantz 660 because its high impedance (600ohms) and sensitivity at 3.5 are an excellent match for the (lousy!!) mic preamps of that recorder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ptfigg</title>
		<link>http://podcastacademy.com/2007/03/07/audio-technica-at804-broadcast-interview-mic/#comment-9980</link>
		<dc:creator>ptfigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcastacademy.com/2007/03/07/audio-technica-at804-broadcast-interview-mic/#comment-9980</guid>
		<description>Shelly,

Good to hear that you are satisfied with the audio quality of the AT 804.

The short barrel length is an important issue, especially if a particular mic is intended for hand-held interviews.

There is an obvious difference in "barrel" length between the Electrovoice RE-50b and the Sennheiser MD-46. The Sennheiser provides extended length.

-ptfigg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shelly,</p>
<p>Good to hear that you are satisfied with the audio quality of the AT 804.</p>
<p>The short barrel length is an important issue, especially if a particular mic is intended for hand-held interviews.</p>
<p>There is an obvious difference in &#8220;barrel&#8221; length between the Electrovoice RE-50b and the Sennheiser MD-46. The Sennheiser provides extended length.</p>
<p>-ptfigg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelly</title>
		<link>http://podcastacademy.com/2007/03/07/audio-technica-at804-broadcast-interview-mic/#comment-9979</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcastacademy.com/2007/03/07/audio-technica-at804-broadcast-interview-mic/#comment-9979</guid>
		<description>I own the AT 804. I've had it for about a year. I haven't owned other omni interview mics, so I'm not qualified to compare it, but I like its audio very much. Its only drawback is that its barrel is very short, making it tricky to hold in your hand when you're having another person speak into it. I've gotten used to it, and have managed to avoid mic-handling noise by beaing careful. The mic is very sturdy, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own the AT 804. I&#8217;ve had it for about a year. I haven&#8217;t owned other omni interview mics, so I&#8217;m not qualified to compare it, but I like its audio very much. Its only drawback is that its barrel is very short, making it tricky to hold in your hand when you&#8217;re having another person speak into it. I&#8217;ve gotten used to it, and have managed to avoid mic-handling noise by beaing careful. The mic is very sturdy, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
